No Symbolism Here

With apologies to any English teachers who may read this blog…

Think back to when you were in high school. Remember your English classes? Remember how the teacher would insist that there was deep and profound meaning in something that you were taking at face value?

Let me give you an example. A character takes a walk in the woods. You thought, “Okay. So the guy takes a walk in the woods. So what?” Your English teacher said, “Don’t you see? The walk in the woods symbolizes something. It represents the sadness of the character, the character’s loneliness and self-fulfilling limitations.”

Breaking news: sometimes a character just wants to take a walk in the woods. No symbolism there. It’s quiet, it’s peaceful, it’s pretty in the woods. It’s a nice place to take a walk. It doesn’t necessarily mean someone is sad or lonely or suffering from self-fulfilling limitations.

You can probably think of a thousand other examples of symbolism being forced on a story where, perhaps, the author never meant anything more than what is written on the page.

I was thinking about this because I was helping a person-who-shall-remain-nameless with an English paper recently. It was based on a short story and the person-who-shall-remain-nameless did a great job on the paper and I told that person as much.

Long story short, that person got a pretty poor grade on the essay. I think I felt worse than the student did because I had helped with the paper. Turns out the English teacher thought certain crucial elements of the story had been left out of the essay. The student (and I) didn’t agree.

It’s an embarrassing situation because my job is writing. I didn’t just decide one day to sit down and start writing. I took countless writing classes in college, I took writing classes in law school, and I wrote daily and endlessly as a lawyer. I like to think I can take a piece of writing and pick out what’s important and what isn’t. But I know there are plenty of English teachers out there who disagree with me. Who think that if I don’t see a deeper meaning in much of what I read, I am reading it wrong.

Sometimes it’s important to read a story just because it’s a good story.

Thousands and thousands of authors write for the simple joy of entertaining, and millions and millions of readers read for the simple joy of being entertained.

I’m not saying that symbolism in writing isn’t important. It is. But sometimes that simple joy of reading can be squelched by the demands placed on the written word. I would never make a good English teacher-I’m too literal. When I read a book I want to escape into the plot, not be bogged down by a hidden meaning that may or may not exist.

I’m thankful that kids today have the opportunity to dig deep into books at school and that they have the benefit of the knowledge and experience of their English teachers, whom I respect and admire. I just want to make sure that kids don’t stop reading outside of school because they’re afraid of missing something important in a book, because they’ve been taught that books have deeper meanings that the kids just don’t understand.

Because sometimes a walk in the woods is just a walk in the woods.

Until next week,

Amy

P.S. With a little bit of luck, maybe the cover of The Ghosts of Peppernell Manor will be revealed next week!

Advertisements

4 comments on “No Symbolism Here

  1. Jenny says:

    HA! I remember my high school English teacher insisting that “the Golden Arches of McDonalds represented fulfillment” as her way of teaching us symbolism. I can’t even begin to imagine what the McRib would mean to her!

    Like

    • amreade says:

      Hi, Jenny,

      I would say that the French fries at McDonald’s represent fulfillment, but that’s as far as I would go. I always thought the golden arches were just a stylized way of writing the letter M! So much for symbolism in that high school English class, huh?

      Thanks for stopping by!

      Like

  2. Amy, I agree wholeheartedly! My favorite class of all-time was an AP English class my senior year of high school where the teacher was able to get students to buy into all the symbolism, foreshadowing, irony, etc WITHOUT squelching our love of literature. And I can only imagine this is even more important the younger the reader and earlier in an educational career. I hope that all the “nameless persons” can get past the poor grade on the essay and remember to love reading.

    Like

    • amreade says:

      Hi, Debbie,

      You’re very lucky to have had a teacher like that. I was thinking more about this post last night. I remembered having to read “Great Expectations” in 7th grade and how our teacher’s analysis of it took endless weeks. I never wanted to look at another book by Charles Dickens. I eventually did, though, and I found that I could appreciate his writing more when I was able to read the books without the pressure of having to find hidden literary meaning.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s